<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
    <title>IT by the Numbers</title>
    <link>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers</link>
    <description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
    <language>en</language>
            <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/techrepublic/it-numbers" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
        <title>E-discovery: IT leaders’ ill preparedness may surprise you</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~3/383554099/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=160#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Mary Weilage</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=160</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[We recently conducted a Web-based survey TechRepublic members to better understand how companies are supporting e-discovery. Here are highlights from the survey.<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=7e6b7d275701b333552da1282b2bdb16" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=7e6b7d275701b333552da1282b2bdb16" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In August 2008, we conducted a Web-based survey of 711 TechRepublic members to better understand how companies are supporting <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/focus/E-discovery.html">e-discovery</a>. Here are highlights from the survey.</p>
<h2>Only 25% of companies have policies and procedures for retention and archiving</h2>
<p><img src="http://i.techrepublic.com.com/gallery/218764-489-295.jpg" alt="Figure A" title="Figure A" /><br />
Source: TechRepublic E-Discovery Survey, August 2008</p>
<h2>71% of companies don&#8217;t provide ESI/e-discovery training</h2>
<p><img src="http://i.techrepublic.com.com/gallery/218765-500-232.jpg" alt="Figure B" title="Figure B" /><br />
Source: TechRepublic E-Discovery Survey, August 2008</p>
<h2>59% of companies archive e-mail but not IM</h2>
<p><img src="http://i.techrepublic.com.com/gallery/218762-500-260.jpg" alt="Figure C" title="Figure C" /><br />
Source: TechRepublic E-Discovery Survey, August 2008</p>
<p><strong><a target="_blank" href="http://downloads.techrepublic.com.com/abstract.aspx?docid=383567">All of the results from our e-discovery survey are available in a downloadable PDF.</a></strong></p>
<p>I found these results in particular interesting because, in Tom Olzak&#8217;s post, &#8220;<a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/tech-manager/?p=547">Five things IT can do to prepare for e-discovery</a>,&#8221; he stresses how important it is for IT leaders to prepare for e-discovery requests through policies and procedures, archiving e-mail and IM, and employee training.</p>
<p>How is your company preparing for e-discovery requests? Let us know by posting to the discussion.</p>
<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=7e6b7d275701b333552da1282b2bdb16" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=7e6b7d275701b333552da1282b2bdb16" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~4/383554099" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?feed=rss2&amp;p=160</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=160</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>Supporting staff who work from home</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~3/355304366/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=159#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=159</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[More employees than ever are working from home. Unlike in the past where reams of paperwork had to be lugged home, technology now makes it possible to remotely access corporate resources - assuming your company has the right hardware and telecommunications services.
Here&#8217;s a look at the costs associated with telecommuting today:

It probably comes as no [...]<br style="clear: both;"/>
      <a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=4368d8adf9b9c55d03ae9aade424f886"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=4368d8adf9b9c55d03ae9aade424f886"/></a>
  <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=4368d8adf9b9c55d03ae9aade424f886" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More employees than ever are working from home. Unlike in the past where reams of paperwork had to be lugged home, technology now makes it possible to remotely access corporate resources - assuming your company has the right hardware and telecommunications services.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a look at the costs associated with telecommuting today:</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/images/workingfromhome.jpg" alt="Working from home" /></p>
<p>It probably comes as no surprise that most organizations are prepared to foot the mobile phone-related bills, broadband connectivity, as well as a laptop or PC. What I thought was interesting is the relatively small percentage of employers who provide support for some form of PBX services. uisite IP-based PBX hardware to furnish off-site telephony services.</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.quocirca.com/pages/analysis/reports/view/store250/item21302/?link_683=21302" target="_blank">Loud and Clear</a>]</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Quocirca is a research and analysis company that prides itself for being <a href="http://www.quocirca.com/pages/analysis/reports/view/dl/store250/item21345/" target="_blank">free from vendor bias</a>. Its Web site notes that its reports are based purely on the analysis of the primary research it carries out by its team of analysts.</p>
<br style="clear: both;"/>
      <a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=4368d8adf9b9c55d03ae9aade424f886"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=4368d8adf9b9c55d03ae9aade424f886"/></a>
  <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=4368d8adf9b9c55d03ae9aade424f886" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~4/355304366" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?feed=rss2&amp;p=159</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=159</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>Getting a second laptop battery</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~3/350742269/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=157#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=157</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[In a recent TechRepublic poll, we asked about the company policies or personal practices in regard to laptop batteries. Here are the results of that poll.

It seems clear from the results that the majority of TechRepublic members with a company-issued laptop do not consider it a necessity to get a spare battery.  About 18 [...]<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=74460799222c4e305a07b802047c11d7" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=74460799222c4e305a07b802047c11d7" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent TechRepublic poll, we asked about the company policies or personal practices in regard to laptop batteries. Here are the results of that poll.</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/images/companylaptop.jpg" alt="Laptop Batteries" /></p>
<p>It seems clear from the results that the majority of TechRepublic members with a company-issued laptop do not consider it a necessity to get a spare battery.  About 18 percent of those who took the poll get a spare battery on company funds while a mere 10 percent pay for it out of their own pocket.</p>
<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=74460799222c4e305a07b802047c11d7" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=74460799222c4e305a07b802047c11d7" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~4/350742269" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?feed=rss2&amp;p=157</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=157</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>E-mail security policies</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~3/345881102/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=154#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=154</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[According to a survey by Webroot, some of the more common e-mail security policies have to do with prohibiting access to personal e-mail accounts from the office or stowing away corporate e-mails to such accounts.  The next common strategy is to enforce a global confidential signature, essentially a signature that is automatically appended to [...]<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=29f1da960e074f74ce4f98fd4a699e64" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=29f1da960e074f74ce4f98fd4a699e64" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a survey by Webroot, some of the more common e-mail security policies have to do with prohibiting access to personal e-mail accounts from the office or stowing away corporate e-mails to such accounts.  The next common strategy is to enforce a global confidential signature, essentially a signature that is automatically appended to all outgoing mails stating the corporate confidential policy.</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/images/emailsecuritypolicy.jpg" alt="Email Security Policies" /></p>
<p><a href="http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=102&amp;threadID=269821" target="_blank">What other security policies would you advocate where e-mail is concerned?</a></p>
<p>[Numbers published in Information Security , May 2008 Issue. Original Source: Webroot survey of 1,494 organizations]</p>
<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=29f1da960e074f74ce4f98fd4a699e64" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=29f1da960e074f74ce4f98fd4a699e64" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~4/345881102" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?feed=rss2&amp;p=154</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=154</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>How many spam do you get in a day?</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~3/345316761/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=153#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=153</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[I ran a poll on &#8220;How many spam do you get in a day?&#8221; a couple of weeks back as part of a weekly roundup piece I posted over at TechRepublic&#8217;s Security blog, and I thought I&#8217;ll share the results over here.

I would like to highlight two conclusions that can be drawn from the survey [...]<br style="clear: both;"/>
      <a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=6b4b71d14346c12259b26b772425330d"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=6b4b71d14346c12259b26b772425330d"/></a>
  <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=6b4b71d14346c12259b26b772425330d" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=492" target="_blank">ran a poll on &#8220;How many spam do you get in a day?&#8221;</a> a couple of weeks back as part of a weekly roundup piece I posted over at <a href="https://ssl.cnb.cnet.com/blogs/security" target="_blank">TechRepublic&#8217;s Security blog</a>, and I thought I&#8217;ll share the results over here.</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/images/spam.jpg" alt="Spam" /></p>
<p>I would like to highlight two conclusions that can be drawn from the survey results.  It is clear that just over a third of those surveyed experienced little (if any) problems with spam.  Another one third, on the other hand, experienced an average of more than 21 spam per day.  Almost a fifth of overall respondents (18%) have what I would term major spam issues, receiving in excess of 41 spams per day.</p>
<p>While it can be argued that this is TechRepublic after all, I thought it the sign of the times that not a single participant opted for the &#8220;cover all&#8221; option of &#8220;I have no idea/I don&#8217;t care/I don&#8217;t use email&#8221;.</p>
<p>Much like how virus and malware have become part and parcel of computing, it is clear that spam is here to stay.  <a href="http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=102&amp;threadID=269738" target="_blank">What strategies do you use to deal with spam?</a></p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=492" target="_blank">Survey conducted in TechRepublic Security blog</a>]</p>
<br style="clear: both;"/>
      <a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=6b4b71d14346c12259b26b772425330d"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=6b4b71d14346c12259b26b772425330d"/></a>
  <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=6b4b71d14346c12259b26b772425330d" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~4/345316761" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?feed=rss2&amp;p=153</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=153</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>Preliminary worldwide PC shipment estimates for 2Q08</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~3/341641957/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=151#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SMB]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=151</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[A preliminary report has been released by Gartner on the number of worldwide PC shipments in the 2nd quarter of 2008.  According to the information technology research firm, the total worldwide PC shipments reached 71.9 million units.  This represents an 16 percent increase from same time in 2007.<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=5d4f1f710bba54e96fef25a9125d1791" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=5d4f1f710bba54e96fef25a9125d1791" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gartner has released a preliminary report on the number of worldwide PC shipments in the 2nd quarter of 2008.  According to the information technology research firm, the total worldwide PC shipments reached 71.9 million units.  This represents a 16 percent increase from the same time in 2007.</p>
<p>Unsurprisingly, a Gartner analyst noted that mobile PCs &#8220;continued to lead unit growth across all regions.&#8221;  More interestingly, <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=724111" target="_blank">he noted that</a> &#8220;The industry could ultimately see a significant wave of consolidation if stronger vendors continue to press their pricing advantage.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you are wary of such &#8220;consolidations,&#8221; then you will probably be glad to know that HP continued to be the leading PC vendor at 18.1 percent of the worldwide market.  It&#8217;s followed closely by Dell at 16 percent of the worldwide market.</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/images/2008q2-pc-shipments.jpg" alt="PC Shpiments for Q2 2008" /></p>
<p>The data in the above chart is in the thousands of units.  It combines desk-based PCs, mobile PCs and X86 servers.</p>
<p><a href="http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=102&amp;threadID=269471" target="_blank">Why not share your favorite brands with us at TechRepublic</a>.</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=724111" target="_blank">Gartner Press Release</a>]</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Gartner, Inc is the world&#8217;s leading information technology research and advisory company. It prides itself on delivering the technology-related insight necessary for its clients to make the right decisions.</p>
<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=5d4f1f710bba54e96fef25a9125d1791" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=5d4f1f710bba54e96fef25a9125d1791" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~4/341641957" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?feed=rss2&amp;p=151</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=151</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>ITIF Broadband Rankings for 2008</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~3/319827579/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=148#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=148</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[If you are trying to get the go-ahead for a Web or Internet-based system and your corporation has footprints in multiple countries, you might just find the ITIF Broadband Rankings useful in arguing your case.<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=14743ea873513ae20f07a0b13a0f0081" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=14743ea873513ae20f07a0b13a0f0081" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re trying to get the go-ahead for a Web or Internet-based system and your corporation has footprints in multiple countries, you might just find the ITIF Broadband Rankings useful in arguing your case.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>While you can hardly use the report without further on-the-ground research, it&#8217;s certainly a starting point.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.itif.org/index.php?id=143" target="_blank">According to its web site</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>[The]</em> ITIF Broadband Rankings are a composite measure of national broadband performance that represent the sum of standard deviation scores for three indicators: household broadband penetration, average speed weighted by percentage of subscribership&#8230; and lowest available price per Mbps.</p></blockquote>
<p>Below is a snippet of the rankings.  Note that the composite score is a standard derivation of the three indicators: Household penetration, speed, and price.</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/images/itif2008.jpg" alt="ITIF Broadband Rankings" /></p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.itif.org/files/2008BBRankings.pdf" target="_blank">2008 ITIF Broadband Rankings</a>]  <em>(pdf)</em></p>
<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=14743ea873513ae20f07a0b13a0f0081" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=14743ea873513ae20f07a0b13a0f0081" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~4/319827579" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?feed=rss2&amp;p=148</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=148</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>PC virtualization gains attention</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~3/309593640/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=146#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=146</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[In an informal poll of readers on virtualization-centric site Virtualization Review, 193 readers (to date) cast their votes on their "primary virtualization concern in 2008." <br style="clear: both;"/>
      <a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=9db4016d4df3af801ca00161c5881130"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=9db4016d4df3af801ca00161c5881130"/></a>
  <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=9db4016d4df3af801ca00161c5881130" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an informal poll of readers on virtualization-centric site <a href="http://virtualizationreview.com/" target="_blank">Virtualization Review</a>, 193 readers <em>(to date)</em> cast their votes on their &#8220;primary virtualization concern in 2008.&#8221;  That virtualization of servers would come out tops is a no-brainer, and forget about the 11% who are still struggling to understand virtualization.</p>
<p>What I found intriguing was the high proportion of votes cast under &#8220;PCs.&#8221;  At the moment, desktop virtualization involves packaging an entire operating system into a virtual machine container, which is normally hosted in the data center.  The result is streamlined desktop management that also happens to be a trivial matter to back up for business continuity and disaster recovery purpose.</p>
<p>Unlike server consolidation which has a pretty clear ROI, the case for desktop virtualization remains somewhat elusive. It remains to be seen whether it will take off.</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/images/primaryvirtualizationconcern.jpg" title="primaryvirtualizationconcern.jpg" alt="primaryvirtualizationconcern.jpg" border="0" /></p>
<p>Have you tried out PC or desktop virtualization yet?</p>
<br style="clear: both;"/>
      <a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=9db4016d4df3af801ca00161c5881130"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=9db4016d4df3af801ca00161c5881130"/></a>
  <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=9db4016d4df3af801ca00161c5881130" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~4/309593640" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?feed=rss2&amp;p=146</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=146</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>User satisfaction with performance of Internet connectivity</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~3/308178594/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=144#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=144</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[ I was browsing a report pertaining to Internet connectivity and came across the chart below, which plots respondents&#8217; perception of their Internet performance. What got my attention was that I&#8217;d just written a short post on Comcast experimenting with other bandwidth throttling methods that do not specifically target peer-to-peer applications.
The argument from Comcast&#8217;s perspective [...]<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=6e53138eb89cccd8e94ebc8b9a393584" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=6e53138eb89cccd8e94ebc8b9a393584" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I was browsing a report pertaining to Internet connectivity and came across the chart below, which plots respondents&#8217; perception of their Internet performance. What got my attention was that I&#8217;d just written a short post on <a href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/networking/?p=537" target="_blank">Comcast experimenting with other bandwidth throttling methods</a> that do not specifically target peer-to-peer applications.</p>
<p>The argument from Comcast&#8217;s perspective is that throttling bandwidth is necessary due to the presence of bandwidth hogs.  My question is: Are there such hogs lurking in your corporate network, sapping precious bandwidth and lowering the perception of Internet connectivity of everyone else?</p>
<p>What can you do to protect against flagrant abuse of your company&#8217;s Internet resources?</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/images/internetperformance.jpg" alt="User Satisfaction with performance of Internet connectivity" /></p>
<p>The above diagram is from page 5 of the source report. It is derived from a survey of 345 organizations in the UK with between 10 to 250 employees.</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.quocirca.com/pages/analysis/reports/view/store250/item21302/?link_683=21302" target="_blank">Soaring not surfing</a>]</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Quocirca is a research and analysis company that prides itself for being <a href="http://www.quocirca.com/pages/about/" target="_blank">free from vendor bias</a>. Its Web site notes that its reports are based purely on the analysis of the primary research it carries out by its team of analysts.</p>
<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=6e53138eb89cccd8e94ebc8b9a393584" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=6e53138eb89cccd8e94ebc8b9a393584" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~4/308178594" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?feed=rss2&amp;p=144</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=144</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>Top 10 most reliable web hosts</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~3/308024226/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=141#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Paul Mah</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web server]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=141</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[Ever have to decide on a host for your company's site but befuddled by the huge range of offerings on the saturated web hosting market? What exactly is the difference between that $4.95/month and the $49.90/month package anyway? Is it all about disk space and bandwidth only?<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=aab7b26227a39b915bbc59472dfbab4b" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=aab7b26227a39b915bbc59472dfbab4b" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever had to decide on a web host for your company&#8217;s site but were befuddled by the huge range of offerings on the saturated web hosting market?  What exactly is the difference between that $4.95/month and the $49.90/month package anyway? Does it all boil down to disk space and bandwidth only - or is there something more?</p>
<p>Well, if you ever had a <a href="http://www.techatplay.com" target="_blank">personal site of your own</a>, you know that not all web hosts are created equal. Unfortunately, it sometimes takes some trial and error before getting the right host for you needs. If reliability and uptime ranks among your requirements however, perhaps the below ranking of the &#8220;most reliable&#8221; web hosts will help you narrow your search a little.</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/images/reliablehosts.jpg" alt="reliablehosts.jpg" /></p>
<p>The above table and measurements come courtesy of Netcraft. Performance measurements are made at 15 minute intervals from four separate locations around the Internet, with averages tabulated over a 24-hour period.</p>
<p>The results were based on the entire month of April 2008.</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2008/05/02/navisite_is_the_most_reliable_hosting_company_site_in_april_2008.html" target="_blank">Netcraft News</a>]</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Netcraft is an Internet services company based in England. According to the <a href="http://news.netcraft.com/about-netcraft" target="_blank">Netcraft Web site</a>, it is funded through retained profit and derives its revenue &#8212; other than advertising on its Web site, from providing Internet security services and providing research data and analysis on various facets of the Internet.</p>
<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=aab7b26227a39b915bbc59472dfbab4b" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=aab7b26227a39b915bbc59472dfbab4b" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techrepublic/it-numbers/~4/308024226" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?feed=rss2&amp;p=141</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/it-numbers/?p=141</feedburner:origLink></item>
    </channel>
</rss>
