TechRepublic : A ZDNet Tech Community

Tech Sanity Check

Category: iPhone

The Tale of Steve Jobs and the Five Dragons

The career of Apple CEO Steve Jobs has been punctuated by so much drama, so many triumphs and tragedies, it has taken on an almost-mythical quality. Now, the leader that rabid Apple fans see as the white knight of the technology world has set off on another mythical quest to slay a new dragon.

So, it seems appropriate to look back on the sometimes-thorny path Jobs has taken, as well as the four dragons that he has slain. And, of course, we’ll look at the new dragon that Jobs is hunting.

Note: This article is also available as a PDF download.

The myth of Steve

Jobs burst on the scene in the late 1970s as the boy leader who became the evangelist of the personal computer revolution. In 1984, he led the team at Apple that brought the graphical user interface to the masses with the Macintosh.

Then, just as quickly as he had burst upon the business world, his world imploded. In a failed struggle for power and control at Apple, he got kicked out of his own company in 1985 and went into exile. He was a rich has-been by the age of 30.

Over the following decade, his next two companies — NeXT Computer (which he founded) and Pixar Animation (which he bought from George Lucas) - quietly made some important breakthroughs in computing but struggled financially and started bleeding away the $100 million fortune that Jobs had made at Apple.

Jobs launched a coup to reclaim his white knight status in the mid-1990s. His first bit of redemption came with Pixar in 1995 when Toy Story became the highest grossing animated feature of all time and Pixar rode that acclaim to a very successful IPO, orchestrated by Jobs himself. Once the IPO launched, it instantly turned Jobs into a billionaire.

His next bit of redemption was even sweeter. At the end of 1996, a badly-struggling Apple decided to purchase NeXT to help reinvent itself as a technology innovator. Jobs initially joined Apple as an advisor as part of the NeXT deal, but he quickly convinced the Apple board to get rid of its leader, Gil Amelio. As a result, Jobs was thrust into the role of “interim CEO” and company savior.

What happened next was a series of conquests that far exceeded anyone’s expectations and returned Apple to the role of technology superpower. These conquests also anointed Steve Jobs with the reputation of being a mix between warrior and magician.

Dragon #1: The Macintosh

When Jobs returned, Apple was in such bad shape that he wasn’t even sure it was salvageable - and industry analysts shared his skepticism. The company’s finances were in the toilet, the product roadmap was a mess, and the Apple brand itself had lost most of its former luster. Something dramatic was needed to save Apple from being bought out in a fire sale or simply fading into oblivion.

Jobs launched a two-part strategy to reinvigorate Apple. He started with the Think Different ad campaign, which associated the Apple brand with creative thinkers and revolutionaries. It was a huge hit, winning awards, drawing consumer interest, and generating tons of media buzz. But, above all, it set the stage for the rebirth of the Macintosh.

While the Think Different ads were making people feel cooler about the fruity computer maker, Jobs also refocused Apple’s product and engineering teams on developing the company’s next great product.

By the late 1990s computer sales were spiking due to the new killer app: the Internet. Lots of people were buying their first computers just to “get online.” Apple latched on to this trend with a computer that was designed to make connecting to the Internet as easy as taking the computer out of the box and plugging in two cords. Jobs and Co. even named it after the Internet - the iMac.

The iMac was a throwback to the original Mac in that it was an integrated all-in-one system, but it also included a unique new design with a translucent blue and white plastic case that allowed you to see the electronics and circuit boards inside. In the world of beige computers at the time, the iMac was extremely stylish. The launch of the iMac in 1998 (combined with the similarly-styled iBook and Power Mac G4 in 1999) drove a huge spike in Mac sales - at one point the iMac was even the single best-selling computer model in the world.

The Mac was back.

Dragon #2: The iPod

One of the things Apple had occasionally done to increase the appeal of the Macintosh platform was to build its own applications to match the style of the Mac and show off its capabilities. With the Mac’s revival and the launch the new Mac OS X operating system in 2001, Apple resurrected the strategy of making some of its own software apps.

One of the apps that it decided to build was a software jukebox so that users could copy music CDs to their Macs and manage all of their music digitally. This was part of Jobs’ strategy of turning Apple into a digital lifestyle brand and the Mac into a personal media hub.

In the process of making the software that would become iTunes, the Apple team also decided to make it compatible with some of the new MP3 players that allowed users to carry some of their songs in the digital equivalent of a Sony Walkman. However, after looking at the various MP3 players, Apple decided that all of them were crap and decided to design its own player instead. That’s when the iPod was born.

The first iPod launched on October 23, 2001 with 5GB of storage and the promise of “1,000 songs in your pocket.” Initially, it was only compatible with Macs and Apple viewed it as an accessory to help increase the appeal of the Mac. But, Jobs quickly realized that the iPod had much broader appeal, and much bigger sales potential.

In 2003, Apple ported iTunes to Windows and sales of the iPod skyrocketed. By the end of 2004, Apple had sold over 8 million iPods and was the dominate force in the digital music player market. Despite this dominance, and the fact that Jobs had convinced the music industry to sell its songs through the iTunes store, there were still a lot of doubts at that point about whether Apple would continue to own this market. With new players coming from Sony, Rio, Creative, Dell, and (eventually) Microsoft, a lot of analysts expected Apple to fade into a niche player, just as it had done in the computer business. It never happened.

By 2009, the iPod accounted for over 70% market share in the digital music player business.

Dragon #3: The Apple Store

When Apple launched the iPod in the fall of 2001, it was a bold and risky move. The company had never had a hit product outside of its computer line, other than companion printers for its computers. Apple was investing a lot in the iPod, and was initially counting on it to help drive a lot of Mac sales.

But, before Apple even launched the iPod, Jobs had already made an even riskier move. On May 19, 2001, Apple opened the doors on its first two retail stores. Both were in malls - in Glendale, California (a suburb of Los Angeles) and Tysons Corner, Virginia (a suburb of Washington, D.C.). The Apple Store was born.

Virtually no one in the press or on Wall Street thought it was a good idea. Gateway and Dell had already tried retail stores and completely flamed out. Microsoft had opened a tech lifestyle store called “microsoftSF” at the Metreon in San Francisco in 1999. Despite its prime location next to the Moscone Convention Center and in the heart of San Francisco’s tech community, it was a flop, too.

David Goldstein, a retail consultant writing for TheStreet.com, stated, “It’s desperation time in Cupertino, California. I give [Apple] two years before they’re turning out the lights on a very painful and expensive mistake.”

A funny thing happened with the Apple Store, though: Customers showed up. Apple designed the stores to be high-touch and low-pressure. There was lots of light and open space and people could wander in and try out Apple products and accessories, get help with Mac hardware and software problems, and take classes on how to do new stuff with their Macs.

When Jobs first opened the Apple Store in 2001, Macintosh market share was hovering around 2% of the personal computer market. By 2010, Mac market share had risen to 10% (although some tracking services claim Mac market share is actually only about 5%).

Even beyond the raw market share gains for Mac, the Apple Stores were a runaway financial success. By the beginning of 2010, there were over 200 Apple Stores in 10 countries. In 2007, Fortune declared Apple the most profitable retailer in America. Apple’s Regent Street store was called the most profitable in London in 2009. And, in the heart of the retail capital of the world, the Fifth Avenue Apple Store in New York City was called the highest grossing retailer in Manhattan by Bloomberg.

The most impressive statistic for the Apple Store may be that, in the brutal world of retail, the company has never had to shut down a single store.

Dragon #4: The iPhone

The successful risks that Apple took with the iPod and its retail stores emboldened Jobs and Co. to take another swing for the fences in 2007. At the Macworld Expo in January that year, Steve walked on to the stage for his annual keynote and told the audience, “We’re going to make to some history together today.”

In a career marked by effective salesmanship, the Macworld 2007 keynote was Jobs at his most persuasive. It also didn’t hurt that he had an innovative product to show off.

Thirty minutes into the keynote Jobs paused momentarily and said, “This is a day I’ve been looking forward to for two and half years. Every once in a while a revolutionary product comes along that changes everything… [You're] very fortunate if you get to work on just one of these in your career. Apple’s been very fortunate. It’s been able to introduce a few of these into the world. In 1984, we introduced the Macintosh. It didn’t just change Apple. It changed the whole computer industry. In 2001, we introduced the first iPod, and it didn’t just change the way we all listen to music, it changed the entire music industry.

“Well, today, we’re introducing three revolutionary products of this class. The first one is a widescreen iPod with touch controls. The second is a revolutionary mobile phone. And, the third is a breakthrough Internet communications device… These are not three separate devices. This is one device, and we are calling it ‘iPhone.’ Today, Apple is going to reinvent the phone.”

In 2007, smartphones were primarily business tools deployed by corporate IT departments. They allowed professionals to check their email from their smartphones at all times. Most of these phones also had some limited Web browsing capabilities, but page loads were slow and reading Web sites on 320×240 screens was not pleasant.

The other problem with the smartphones of the time was that they were difficult to use. The Palm Treo, the BlackBerry, and the various Windows Mobile devices all had a fairly steep learning curve. For consumers buying smartphones at retail locations, there were reports of up to a 50% return rate, simply because people couldn’t figure out how to use them.

With the iPhone, Apple wanted to solve two problems. First, it wanted to make smartphones much easier to use, and second, it wanted to make the smartphone a legitimate Web browsing device. With its touch-based interface, the iPhone hit it out of the park on the first goal. From the first day it hit the market (June 30, 2007), the iPhone was the easiest smartphone to use. Many competitors have emulated it since then, but it arguably remains the most simple UI to navigate, especially for new users.

In terms of its goal of putting the full Web browser in the palm of your hand, the first iPhone arguably did succeed in offering the first fully functional and readable Web browser, mostly because of its pinch-to-zoom UI. However, this was negated by the fact that the first iPhone did not have 3G connectivity. So, even though the browser worked well, the Web browsing experience was painfully slow unless you were on Wi-Fi.

The other problem with the first generation iPhone was that it wasn’t very useful, especially for business professionals. It did not have the email functionality of the BlackBerry or the Treo, and it didn’t have a lot of applications to take advantage of the easy new UI. As a result, a lot of executives and IT departments wrote it off as a toy - mostly just a fancy iPod with a phone in it.

Apple stepped up its game with the second generation iPhone, giving it 3G functionality, Exchange ActiveSync support, better security features for businesses, and opening it up to third-party applications. Then, the third generation iPhone mostly pumped up the internal horsepower of the device.

By the end of 2009, U.S. market share for the iPhone climbed to 30% in a growing smartphone market crowded with a lot of players. Meanwhile, iPhone’s global market share grew to 17% in 2009.

However, the biggest victory for the iPhone has been its application ecosystem, which has attracted the most software developers and the most application installs. After opening the doors of its App Store in the summer of 2008, the App Store served its billionth download nine months later on April 23, 2009. Five months later on September 28, 2009, it served its two billionth download. A little over three months later on January 5, 2010, the App Store served its three billionth download.

Dragon #5: The Tablet

Long before Apple released the iPhone, there were rumors that the company was developing a tablet computer. Part of that was due to the PDA legacy with the Apple Newton and part of it was due to expected competition with Microsoft’s Tablet PC.

However, an Apple Tablet never appeared. Some of the technology that was rumored to be in the tablet, such as the multi-touch UI, eventually showed up in the iPhone. Nevertheless, the rumors of an Apple Tablet continued even after the iPhone was released. On the heels of one tablet rumor, I remember having a detailed conversation with Macworld Editor in Chief Jason Snell in the summer of 2008 about what an Apple Tablet might entail and why anybody would want one.

In 2009, the rumors of an impending Apple Tablet started to heat up. There was a report in March that Apple had ordered a bunch of 10-inch touchscreens. There were rumors in July that PA Semi, which Apple had acquired in 2008, was building the chips for the Apple Tablet. Then came the rumor in August from The Wall Street Journal that Jobs, who had just returned to Apple after a brush with death and a liver transplant, was spending nearly all of his time and energy on the development of a new touchscreen tablet. Oh, and in September, Apple hired back an original developer from the Newton team.

Ever since The Wall Street Journal article, most analysts, journalists, and observers in the tech industry have assumed that an Apple Tablet was coming. The main question was the timing.

The other big question centered around what the purpose of the tablet would be. Would it just be a big-screen iPhone or iPod Touch? Would it be a Mac laptop with a multi-touch screen and no keyboard? Would it be an e-reader? Would it be gaming platform (after all, games are a big part of the App Store)?

Ask five tech industry experts about the Apple Tablet and you’re likely to get at least six different answers. Still the general consensus is the Applet Tablet will be a personal media device and it’s primary function will be consuming digital content in various forms - text, audio, video, and a new breed of multimedia mashups.

The most revolutionary aspect of this device is that it could usher in a new era of interactive reading that would change books, newspapers, and magazines forever. As we heard Jobs say in his 2007 iPhone presentation, he loves to create products that can revolutionize industries, and a big swing for the fences like this one would be right up his alley.

It’s no secret that these are all industries that are desperately struggling to adapt their business models to the digital age. If Jobs could provide a new platform for them to do it and bring the masses a 21st century reading experience in the process, it would rank as another major conquest in Jobs’ prolific career.

Apple has reportedly been wooing content partners for months. Some have even posted their concepts for tablet-based content. Sport Illustrated offered a video of what its digital future could look like, and Ray Kurzweil’s Blio eReader software provides a glimpse of what the future of interactive e-books could be.

Recently, Steve Jobs reportedly said, “This will be the most important thing I’ve ever done.”

Coming from him, that says a lot. For that reason, it’s also a tall order. Does he have it in him to slay another dragon?

Verizon vs. AT&T: Who's right and who's winning?

In the wake of Verizon’s public attack on AT&T’s 3G network, the two U.S. wireless carriers are now locked in a sparring match. Here’s the scorecard.

The Big Question is a joint production from ZDNet and TechRepublic that I co-host with ZDNet Editor in Chief Larry Dignan. This week’s guest is Andrew Nusca, an editor for ZDNet and SmartPlanet.

You can play this 18-minute episode from the Flash-based player at the top of the page or:

If you enjoy this podcast, please go to to our iTunes page to rate it and leave a short review.

Stories discussed in this episode:

Video: The five best smartphones for business 2009

Smartphones are becoming a standard tool for many of today’s knowledge workers and IT professionals. However, the number of smartphone choices on the market is exploding. We’d like to help IT leaders pinpoint the top smartphones for workers who are looking for serious productivity. This episode of CIO Sanity Savers counts down 2009’s five best smartphones for businesses.

If you prefer reading text to watching video, please click the “Transcript” link underneath the video. Below the video window you’ll also find links for more information about the top five smartphones that made the list.

Here are links to read more about each of the top five:

  1. BlackBerry Tour
  2. Apple iPhone 3GS
  3. Palm Pre
  4. HTC Touch Pro2
  5. Nokia E71

Some of you may ask why the Motorola Droid didn’t make the list. After all, it’s a new smartphone that has received excellent reviews and is made to be very business-friendly. The reason is simple: It’s still too new at this point. We’d like to see it get adopted by some business users and hear their thoughts on how well the Droid integrates into business. However, an upcoming episode of CIO Sanity Savers will examine the Droid as a business device and report on TechRepublic’s perspective of it.

Tools for building iPhone sites and a gallery of the best designs

Building mobile applications and designing mobile sites are some of the hottest topics in tech in 2009. It’s no secret that the iPhone is the mobile platform with the most momentum in terms of applications - mostly due to the simplicity and usability of its user interface.

Smashing Magazine has put together a showcase of top Web designs optimized for the iPhone. Keep in mind that these are not iPhone apps. These are Web pages designed for the iPhone’s 320×480 screen. Apple sometimes refers to these as iPhone Web Apps. Here’s how Smashing Magazine describe the iPhone-optimized Web sites:

“Though iPhone’s Safari browser is able to render any Website just like you would see it on a desktop browser, the available screen area is much smaller than in common ‘classic’ displays. This poses a new challenge for designers and developers who now can reach millions of users that use mobile Web. Websites that are specifically optimized for the iPhone utilize the screen to the fullest extent, and use less bandwidth (which is necessary, because the connectivity is not always optimal). The iPhone browsing experience is quite different than the regular browsing experience. The buttons and hyperlinks have to be bigger because our fingers are not as sharp as the mouse pointer. Optimizing a website for iPhone is not rocket science. It’s the same HTML, CSS and JavaScript that you already know. The only major difference is the screen size.”

Then Smashing Magazine provides a collection of what its editors consider the best and most usable Web designs optimized for the iPhone screen. It divides them into five categories:

  1. News/Entertainment
  2. Business/Corporate
  3. Shopping/E-Commerce
  4. Portfolio/Blog
  5. Education/Content

Each category includes links and screenshots to the top sites in each category. For example, check out the designs below from the MIT mobile site, the NBC mobile site, and the site pleasefixtheiphone.com.

The other thing Smashing Magazine offered was a list of links to tools that can help developers design sites for the iPhone:

Also see the following TechRepublic articles:

Radiation threats: The 10 most potentially hazardous smartphones

Based on new research, learn the 10 smartphones that emit the most radiation, the 10 that emit the least radiation, and a few quick safety tips.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————

One of the scariest unknown technology risks of this decade is the issue of radiation from cell phones. There’s still an open question about whether long term exposure to these mobile devices will cause damage or disease to human beings.

The Environmental Working Group has a comprehensive new study (download the full report as a PDF) that surveys the scientific research on cellphone heath risks and provides radiation data for most of the current cellphones in use. Here’s how the EWG explained the mission of its study:

We at Environmental Working Group are still using our cell phones, but we also believe that until scientists know much more about cell phone radiation, it’s smart for consumers to buy phones with the lowest emissions. The U.S. government ought to require cell phone companies to label their products’ radiation output so that consumers can do the numbers at the point of sale. It doesn’t, so EWG has created this user-friendly interactive online guide to cell phone emissions, covering over 1,000 phones currently on the market.

The EWG study looks at all mobile phones, but since smartphones are becoming a standard tool for businesses and IT professionals, I’ve drilled down and looked at the list from a smartphone perspective. I’ve broken out the 10 smartphones that produce the most radiation, the 10 that product the least amount of radiation, and a list of the radiation ratings of some of the most popular smartphones that did not make either of those two lists.

When you look at these lists, keep in mind that the EWG has also included some older models that are no longer being sold but are still used by many workers and consumers. Also note that “W/kg” stands for watts per kilogram, a measurement for power density.

The 10 smartphones with the highest radiation

  1. T-Mobile MyTouch 3G (1.55 W/kg)
  2. Blackberry Curve 8330 (1.54 W/kg)
  3. Palm Treo 600 (1.53 W/kg)
  4. T-Mobile Shadow (1.53 W/kg)
  5. Palm Treo 650 (1.51 W/kg)
  6. Blackberry Curve 8300 (1.51 W/kg)
  7. Blackberry Bold 9000 (1.51 W/kg)
  8. Sony Ericsson P910a (1.50 W/kg)
  9. HTC SMT 5800 (1.49 W/kg)
  10. BlackBerry Pearl 8120/8130 (1.48 W/kg)

The T-Mobile MyTouch 3G, an HTC smartphone powered by Google Android that debuted to lots of fanfare this summer, topped the list of the worst radiation offenders. However, other popular smartphones dominated the list as well, especially BlackBerries and Treos. The BlackBerry Curve, the best-selling smartphone on the market in 2009, was a close second on the list, and it was joined in the top 10 by its cousins, the BlackBerry Pearl and the BlackBerry Bold.

The 10 smartphones with lowest radiation

  1. Nokia 9300i (0.21 W/kg)
  2. Nokia 7710 (0.22 W/kg)
  3. T-Mobile MDA Wiza200 (0.28 W/kg)
  4. Samsung Impression SGH-a877 (0.35 W/kg)
  5. Nokia 9300 (0.44 W/kg)
  6. Samsung Propel Pro SGH-i627 (0.47 W/kg)
  7. Samsung Gravity SGH-t459 (0.49 W/kg)
  8. BlackBerry Storm 9530 (0.57 W/kg)
  9. Nokia E90 (0.59 W/kg)
  10. Nokia N96 (0.68 W/kg)

Nokia, with five models in this top 10, and Samsung with three, were clearly the winners in terms of smartphones that emit the least amount of radiation. It’s also interesting to note that although both of these companies produce dozens of different models, neither of them had a single model that made the list of the worst radiation offenders. The surprising member of the low-radiation club was the BlackBerry Storm (RIM’s first touchscreen device) since so many of the other popular BlackBerries were on the high-emitters list.

Other notables, from lowest to highest

If there’s another phone you’d like to look up, here is the full list. Also, when seriously evaluating any smartphone on any of these lists, make sure you click through and look at the EWG page with the details of the phone’s radiation emissions using different connections and doing different activities. The number listed is the maximum radiation rating, but it can be deceiving in some cases until you look at the whole picture.

For example, the iPhone 3GS has a rating of 1.19 W/kg, which is a middle-of-the-pack rating. However, 1.19 is its maximum radiation level, which only happens when it is connected in UMTS 1900MHz mode. In its other four modes, it averages 0.63 W/kg, which is more consistent with the lower tier of radiation emitters.

Safety tips

As part of the report, the EWG also provided eight safety tips for cellphone users who are concerned about radiation. Here is a quick list of the tips. You can click through to the original list for more detail on each of the items.

  1. Buy a low-radiation phone
  2. Use a headset or speaker
  3. Listen more, talk less
  4. Hold phone away from your body
  5. Choose texting over talking
  6. Poor signal? Stay off the phone
  7. Limit children’s phone use
  8. Skip the “radiation shield”

The EWG also offers a one-page PDF that lists all eight of these tips along with a further explanation of each. IT professionals might consider distributing this PDF to employees who use company cellphones or posting it on the corporate intranet. Of course, you should consult senior management and your legal department before distributing something like this since it involves employee health.

See also: Are cell phones safe? Researchers still uncertain (CNET)

Bottom line

While there isn’t conclusive scientific evidence proving that cellphones cause illnesses or diseases in humans, the EWG report does point to research that has shown links between prolonged cellphone use and  brain cancer, salivary gland tumors, migraines and vertigo, and decreased male sperm count (from carrying a cellphone in the pocket).

A lot more research still needs to be done, but in the meantime it makes sense for mobile manufacturers to limit cellphone radiation whenever possible and for users to be aware of which phones produce the most radiation so that they can take steps to limit radiation exposure as a precautionary step.

UPDATE 09/14/2009, 9:00 AM EST: I got a note from Daniel Van Hoy, a broadcast engineer, who wrote, “There is a big difference between ‘ionizing’ and ‘non-ionizing’ radiation… Cell phones, radios and TV transmissions emit non-ionizing radiation that has a longer wavelength, lower frequency and lower overall energy per photon than UV light, X-rays and gamma rays (a form of radioactivity), which are known as ionizing radiation because they have enough power to eject an electron from its orbit and leave behind a charged ion that can damage cells and tissues.” I verified this information to be correct. There’s also more on ionizing vs. non-ionizing radiation from the U.S. EPA.

Are you concerned about mobile phone radiation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Will mobile phone radiation numbers influence your next purchase?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Product spotlight: iPhone 3GS for business users

The Apple iPhone is perhaps the best-known smartphone on the planet, drooled over by Apple lovers and consumer electronics enthusiasts, but how well does the latest model - the iPhone 3GS - stack up for business users? Here is TechRepublic’s unadulterated evaluation of the iPhone 3GS from a business and IT perspective.

For a full visual of the iPhone 3GS and a quick summary of its strengths and weaknesses, check out this short video clip, and then read the full review below:

Get our latest field-tested reviews of hardware and software in TechRepublic’s Product Spotlight newsletter, delivered each Thursday. Sign up now with a single click.

Specifications

  • Carriers: AT&T Wireless (U.S.), full list of international carriers
  • Processor: 600MHz (Samsung S5PC100)
  • RAM: 256MB
  • Storage: 16GB or 32GB Flash memory
  • Display: 3.5-inch 480×320 pixel HVGA LCD touchscreen
  • Battery life: Standby time: Up to 300 hours; Talk time: Up to 5 hours on 3G; Internet use: Up to 5 hours on 3G and up to 9 hours on Wi-Fi;
  • Weight: 4.8 ounces (135 grams)
  • Dimensions: 4.5(h) x 2.4(w) x 0.48(d)
  • Camera: 3 megapixels with autofocus and video recording
  • Keyboard: 33-key onscreen-only, both portrait and landscape
  • Networks: Wi-Fi; UMTS/HSDPA (850, 1900, 2100 MHz); GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)
  • Tethered modem capability: Yes (though not yet activated on AT&T)
  • Price: $199 for 16GB, $299 for 32GB
  • Official iPhone 3GS product page
  • Photo gallery: iPhone 3GS

Who is it for?

This device is great for users who’ve had trouble using other smartphones, because the iPhone has the easiest UI to navigate - in fact, many toddlers can even figure out how to make it work. The iPhone is also a great fit for users who do a lot of reading on their smartphones, including email, documents, and ebooks, because it has a large high-resolution LCD screen and it’s easy to zoom in or make the text larger, if needed, in most programs. It’s not as good for users who do a ton of typing, texting, or data entry because it is limited to an onscreen keyboard.

What problems does it solve?

The iPhone has two major innovations: user interface and smartphone applications. The UI has made smartphones usable for the masses for the first time. With the help of third party developers who have built over 50,000 applications, the iPhone has become infinitely more useful than previous smartphones, which were basically just cellphones that could sync with your corporate email and calendar. For business users, there is a wide array of apps that now do everything from helping you quickly hail a cab based on your GPS location, to reading The Wall Street Journal, to quickly accessing a company dashboard from an Oracle database, to tracking a FedEx package.

Standout features

  • Accessing the Web - With its big screen, fast processor, 3G connection, and great UI, the iPhone is best smartphone on the market for browsing standard Web pages. Period. Also, beyond its App Store platform (which requires programming in Objective C and submission to Apple for approval), the iPhone also has a Web app platform in which any person or company can build Web pages aimed at iPhone.
  • Reading documents - Again, with the big screen, this is just a great reading device, for PDFs, Word files, and even ebooks and longer documents. There are a variety of third party applications that can make all Microsoft Office documents easy to read and manage on the iPhone.
  • Multimedia device - This device is excellent for viewing video files and listening to audio books and business podcasts. The built-in camera is even pretty respectable, with video recording and a great autofocus feature that allows you to tap on the screen to focus on a specific thing.
  • Application ecosystem - As we’ve discussed, the iPhone has developed into a powerful platform for third party developers to bring lots of additional functionality to the device. All apps require Apple Review in order to make it into the App Store. That insures that no rogue software makes it into the iPhone but it’s also limiting at times, as we’ve seen with the controversy surrounding the rejected Google Voice app.

What’s wrong?

  • No hardware keyboard - The biggest limitation of the iPhone is its on-screen keyboard. The onscreen keyboard is functional for moderate use and the landscape keyboard in the iPhone 3.0 software is a nice improvement, but for those who do heavy emailing, text messaging, or data entry, the iPhone is simply not as fast or as effective as a smartphone with a hardware keyboard.
  • Doesn’t match up to BES - Even with the new Exchange integration, the iPhone does not have the same level of security and IT manageability as you get with BlackBerry smartphones that connect to a backend BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES), which is still the IT department’s smartphone platform of choice. In high security environments like government or the financial sector, the BlackBerry will still be the smartphone of choice and the iPhone will not be widely implemented.
  • Limited to AT&T - In the U.S., the iPhone is limited to a single carrier, AT&T, and AT&T’s coverage and network performance simply aren’t good enough for business-class usage in some parts of the country.

Competitive products

Bottom line for business

The iPhone is the easiest smartphone to learn how to use, and the easiest to operate on a daily basis. It is also the best device for Web browsing and reading documents. The iPhone’s massive collection of over 50,000 third party applications also give it a big advantage in usefulness over most other smartphones. However, if you need a smartphone to do heavy typing or messaging, or you need a device with enterprise-class security and IT manageability, then you’d be better off with the BlackBerry Tour or the BlackBerry Bold.

User rating

Have you used or supported the iPhone 3GS? If so, what do you think? Rate the device and compare the results to what other TechRepublic members think. You can also give your own personal review of the iPhone 3GS in the discussion thread below.

How would you rate the iPhone 3GS?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The 10 best-selling smartphones of Q2; more momentum for BlackBerry, iPhone

The earnings reports of most of the big public technology companies for Q2 2009 were a lot like “confessionals,” as my colleague Larry Dignan likes to say. Most segments of the tech industry are struggling through lower sales and an uncertain forecast for the rest of 2009.

One of tech’s few bright spots is smartphones. Gartner reported that worldwide mobile phone unit sales were down 6 per cent in Q2 2009 (compared to Q2 2008), but smartphone unit sales were up 27% for the same period.

Meanwhile, IDC reported that the worldwide mobile phone unit sales were down a steeper 10.8% in Q2 compared to Q2 2008. And while IDC also found strength in smartphones, the analyst house noted that competition was fierce and a price war had broken out:

“This demand for high-end mobile phones has created a price war among large mobile operators and handset vendors. Apple’s price cut on the iPhone 3G reflects a trend we expect to continue in the upcoming quarters, and one that will effectively maintain competitive pricing within mature markets.”

Another interesting part of the IDC report was that it listed the top-selling smartphones. In the U.S. market, these were the top 10:

  1. BlackBerry Curve (right)
  2. Apple iPhone 3GS
  3. BlackBerry Pearl
  4. Apple iPhone 3G
  5. BlackBerry Bold
  6. BlackBerry Storm
  7. HTC Google G1
  8. Palm Pre
  9. HTC Touch Pro
  10. HTC Touch Diamond

It’s not surprising to see BlackBerry and Apple dominating the top six slots since those two have grabbed most of the attention of U.S. buyers. It’s also interesting to note that the Curve and the Pearl are available from nearly all of the U.S. cellular carriers while the iPhone is still currently limited to just AT&T.

HTC also made a strong showing with its original Android phone (G1) and its two Windows Mobile phones (Touch Pro and Touch Diamond) and Palm Pre made the list despite the fact that it didn’t arrive until June 6.

Notice the companies that are missing from the top smartphones list: Nokia, Samsung, and Motorola. All three are expected to make a better showing in the second half of the year with new devices, but the pressure definitely got turned up a notch in Q2 after iPhone and BlackBerry both registered solid marketshare gains.

Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi also recently reported that he expects the iPhone to record sales of 20 million units in 2009. He sees that growing to 50 million units by 2011, due to general smartphone market growth, Apple expanding to more carriers and more countries, and the iPhone arriving in China.

Further reading:

Majority of CIOs still reject the iPhone, but resistance is weakening

When the Apple iPhone was released in 2007, CIOs and IT departments almost universally rejected it as a device that was not fit for business. Two years later, with the third generation of iPhone hardware now on the market, Microsoft Exchange support available, and an active ecosystem of third party applications, many CIOs are beginning to warm up to the iPhone.

On August 4, TechRepublic polled its group of U.S. IT leaders and asked, “Does your IT department support the iPhone as an approved device?” The jury, made up of the first 12 respondents, had seven IT chiefs who said “no” and five who said “yes.”

TechRepublic’s CIO Jury is based on the original CIO Jury concept developed by Silicon.com, where you can find lively opinions from IT leaders based in the UK.

Our CIO Jury in this case was:

  1. Brian Terry, Vice President of IT for Constitution Corporate Federal Credit Union
  2. Chuck Musciano, CIO of Martin Marietta Materials
  3. Thomas Galbraith, Director of IT for US District Court So District of IL
  4. Jeff Relkin, Director of IT for Quadel
  5. Chuck Elliott, IT Director of Emory University School of Medicine
  6. Steve Shead, IT Director of Cafepress
  7. Michael Stoyanovich, CIO of Benesys
  8. Chris Brown, Vice President of Technology at Big Splash Web Design
  9. Matthew Metcalf, Director of IS for Northwest Exterminating
  10. Gary Wolf, Director of IT for Free Methodist Church of North America
  11. Scott Lowe, CIO for Westminster College
  12. Adam Bertram, IT Director of McKendree Village

So, 42% of these CIOs now support the iPhone and many of them offered interesting commentary on why they do or don’t allow the iPhone. In fact, we have comments from many other IT leaders in the 90-member panel, beyond just the 12 that made up the jury.

Representing the iPhone holdouts, Musciano said, “I am still not convinced that the iPhone is secure enough for enterprise deployment. The various vulnerabilities exposed in just the past week make me even less likely to consider the iPhone for the enterprise any time soon.”

On the other side was Mike Wagner, CIO of Stone & Youngberg in San Francisco, who reported:

The iPhone is one of the most innovative and revolutionary end-user products developed in the last 5 years. Like most IT Departments, we boycotted the first release of the iPhone but the subsequent release that supported [Exchange] ActiveSync was a game changer for corporate IT. Over the last several years we have supported mobile OSes from Palm, Blackberry, and Microsoft. The support and training requirements for the iPhone are orders of magnitude less than the mobile OSes offered by competing vendors. Another big plus of supporting the iPhone is the general excitement and enthusiasm from the end users and a corresponding decrease in the perception that IT is a wet blanket that is an impediment to the use of consumer-friendly products. Overall, implementing and supporting the iPhone has been an incontrovertible win for the IT department and end users.

Below is an additional selection of comments from the IT leaders, divided into the “yes” and “no” voters.

Yes

  • “It’s actually been a great device for the IT group itself, used to remotely manage servers and other tools. The sales folks love it, and it has so far been less of a support issue than the other phones.” (Edward Beck, Vice President of IT for Line 6, Inc.)
  • “We have found that resistance is futile. The iPhone is the most popular handheld device available. It has the best mobile browser and our sysadmins say it is a great device for remote systems administration.” (Ed Sefton, CIO of Commonwealth Financial Network)
  • “Utilizing the iPhone for traveling executives has cut down on VPN support considerably. Executives don’t need to VPN as much to conduct regular business operations.” (Nicholas Dibble, CIO of BuyOnlineNow)
  • “Why deny the undeniable. It is simply the best mobile platform available. It offers a cutting edge GUI that delivers a superior customer experience.” (Michael Boyle, CIO of Allstate)
  • “We only provide full support for the C level execs’ Blackberries (3 total). For everyone else, we will allow them to sync a Blackberry or iPhone on a effort-as-available basis. As IT chief, I have an iPhone.” (Bob Hickcox, Director of IT for Girl Scouts of MN and WI)
  • “Yes, but as with all personally purchased handheld devices, support is limited. We will help users connect to our Exchange server, but if the device has problems, they’re responsible for getting it fixed.” (Jeanne DeVore, Head of IT for Chicago Shakespeare Theater)
  • “Yes, in fact, it’s our preferred device.” (Scott Lowe, CIO for Westminster College) Also, see Scott’s TechRepublic article Out with Treos, in with iPhones on why his organization recently adopted the iPhone.
  • “The 3G iPhones are integrating well into our network. End users are very happy with the performance.” (Matthew Metcalfe, Director of IS for Northwest Exterminating)
  • “Although we don’t supply them as a standard offering, we will interface any privately purchased iPhones with our corporate systems.” (Jeff Relkin, Director of IT for Quadel)

No

  • “We still view the iPhone as a personal device, not a business device.” (Kurt Schmidt, IT Director of Capital Credit Union)
  • “iPhones are not supported because they are considered personal gadgets.” (Lisa Moorehead, Director of IT for MA Dept of Public Utilities)
  • “For business purposes we have yet to see any advantage the iPhone has over Blackberry. Thus far Blackberry has been easier for us from a change management/helpdesk management perspective. Less change means less cost and that’s a key driver for us in the current economic environment.” (Jeff Cannon, CIO of Fire and Life Safety America)
  • “Due to the ease of management that comes with using a BES, Blackberries are our only supported devices. We will show our users how to access email on their iPhones just like we do for Windows Mobile devices but after that, they’re on their own.” (Rob Paciorek, CIO of Access Intelligence, LLC)
  • “I do not support it at this time. The only reason is because we’re on an older version of Exchange. If I was more up-to-date, I would support it with tight security measures.” (Donna Porter, Corporate Director of IT for Evans Hotels)
  • “No, although that is because AT&T is not available here. There are some excellent medical apps for iPhones which are well worth exploring.” (Jerry Horton, CIO of Bob Wilson Memorial Hospital in Ulysses, KS)
  • “No, because we have had bad coverage from AT&T.” (David Wilson, Director of IT for VectorCSP in Elizabeth City, NC)
  • “Due to service problems with AT&T in our area it is not a viable option.” (Joel Robertson, Director of IT for King College in Bristol, TN)
  • “No. However, we are finding more and more of our users are buying and using the device without assistance from IT.” (Chuck Elliott, IT Director for Emory University School of Medicine)

In June, Silicon.com asked its group of U.K IT chiefs if they planned to offer the iPhone as an official corporate device and only one out of twelve said “yes.” Even though their question was a little bit different (since it focused on deploying the iPhone as an official corporate device), the comparison is interesting.

Would you like to be part of TechRepublic’s CIO Jury and have your say in the hottest issues for IT departments? If you are a CIO, CTO, IT director or equivalent at a large or small company in the private or public sector and you want to be part of TechRepublic’s CIO Jury pool, drop us a line at ciojury@techrepublic.com.

Generator Research: iPhone will overtake Nokia in 2012

Generator Research, a small firm focused on digital media and the Internet, has released a new report predicting that the Apple iPhone’s current growth trajectory will enable it to catch and surpass Nokia for the top spot in the global smartphone market within three years.

The report sees iPhone growth accelerating due to a combination of the rapid multiplication of apps and the price drop of $99 for the lowest-priced iPhone. Meanwhile, Generator Research also predicts that Nokia will stumble and see its market share cut in half from 40% in 2008 to just 20% in 2013.

Chart credit: Electronista

Quick analysis

This report appears to compare Apple and Nokia in a vacuum. It sees only modest growth for other smartphones in the years ahead. That doesn’t take into account the momentum that both BlackBerry and Palm also have right now. I think we have to expect that as the smartphone market grows steeply over the next several years, it’s going to lift several boats, not just the iPhone.

As the smartphone market grows and consolidates, Nokia is definitely vulnerable, as is Windows Mobile. Google’s Android platform is still a wildcard. It has potential, but also has some serious challenges to overcome.

However, this market is still extremely fluid. Nokia has yet to launch its new Symbian OS. Windows Mobile 7.0 comes out in early 2010. And there’s still the possibility that Android could find the right hardware partner and turn its fortunes around.

If there’s anything that could give the iPhone to leap forward in the global market, it could be partnerships with new mobile carriers. For example, if the iPhone comes to Verizon in the U.S. in late 2010 (as rumored), it could have a very disruptive impact on that market.

Use these apps to make iPhone a mobile office productivity tool

  • Date: June 29th, 2009
  • Blogger: Jason Hiner
  • Category: Apple, iPhone

With Microsoft Exchange support and a fleet of business-oriented apps, the iPhone is being utilized as a business tool by IT workers, CEOs, small business owners, and lots of other professionals. CNET’s Jessica Dolcourt has put together a gallery of iPhone apps and tools that can help business professionals squeeze out even more productivity.

Further reading:

Palm Pre vs. iPhone 3G S: The choice I made and why

This year will very likely be remembered as the year of the smartphone (at least in the IT world). A fleet of new devices are attracting new users to the smartphone market, led by the Palm Pre and the Apple iPhone 3G S. Since I’ve been in the market for a new smartphone, see which one I chose and why.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————

As I mentioned in my article iPhone: Why I may be seduced by the dark side, I am in the market for a new smartphone this summer. The good news is that there are some very strong devices out there right now, including the iPhone 3G S, Palm Pre, Google Ion, Nokia N97, and BlackBerry Tour. The bad news is that I narrowed down my choices to the Palm Pre and the iPhone 3G S (below) and I’ve had a really tough time choosing between the two.

Since there are other individuals, small businesses, and IT departments deciding between these two high-end smartphones, I decided to lay out my decision-making process in order to provide a little decision support to my friends and colleagues in the business world.

First, I should explain my smartphone requirements. I’m looking for a device to serve as my personal phone, media player, and backup for all of my email, calendar, and contacts. I already have a BlackBerry Curve 8320 on T-Mobile that is my company smartphone from CBS. It handles my business calls and securely manages all of my corporate email and groupware data.

The challenge is that I travel regularly and when I travel my smartphone is my primary computing device. It carries all of my travel itineraries, meeting schedules, and contacts. So, if my smartphone was lost, stolen, or seriously malfunctioned while I was on the road then I would be in serious trouble.

Thus, I need a backup. I need a smartphone that can run all of my corporate Exchange data through Microsoft ActiveSync while functioning as my device for personal calls (minimal), personal text messages, and my personal Gmail account. I’m also looking for a smartphone that can complement the BlackBerry Curve in two key areas where it is weak: mobile Web browsing and media playback.

For me, that narrowed the field to two clear candidates: Palm Pre and iPhone. If I didn’t already have a business device and I was looking for a single smartphone that could handle corporate-level security and lots of data entry then the choice would have likely been between the Palm Pre (right) and the BlackBerry Tour, with a slight nod to the Tour because of its BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES) backend and the fact that it will be available later this summer on Verizon Wireless, the strongest of the big four U.S. mobile networks.

In evaluating the iPhone 3G S and the Palm Pre, I’m equally impressed by the touch screens, software interfaces, and usability of both devices. These two are really the standard-setters in usability and the other smartphones on the market all have some catching up to do. I also felt that both devices were excellent for reading everything from emails to news to documents.

When I had to get down to making a decision, I came up with the following lists that break down the strengths that each of these smartphones has over the other one. I also identified the primary drawbacks to the Pre and the iPhone.

Palm Pre

  • Hardware keyboard
  • Excellent multi-tasking
  • Palm Synergy for bringing contacts and calendars into a single view
  • Separates business and personal data while seamlessly providing a merged look at the data
  • Better mobile network at a reasonable price from Sprint
  • Not locked into iTunes
  • Small form factor and very portable

Biggest drawbacks: Still needs an ecosystem of app developers, Palm and Sprint are both struggling companies

iPhone 3G S

  • Broad array of useful applications that take advantage of the strengths of the device
  • One of the best LCD screens in the smartphone market
  • Works with existing iPhone/iPod accessories (including docks in my office, bedroom, and kitchen)
  • Amazon Kindle app for reading books on the road
  • Great apps for news reading (including USA Today, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Associated Press, Reuters, and more)
  • National Wi-Fi network included in data plan from AT&T
  • Superior media player functionality
  • Proven platform with a ton of momentum in the marketplace

Biggest drawbacks: Lack of hardware keyboard, inconsistent AT&T network

My decision

In the end, the maturity of the iPhone platform won out. I was primarily influenced by the fact that the iPhone is now in its third generation of hardware and software and the platform features over 50,000 third-party applications (in just over a year after first releasing the iPhone SDK).

I was tempted by the powerful multi-tasking of the Palm Pre and its Synergy functionality, but the iPhone’s huge selection of apps makes it infinitely more useful at this point. I also wanted a functional media player since I was going to be carrying an extra phone I wanted to be able to leave my iPod behind. That meant that I needed to be able to carry my favorite music playlists along with podcasts and audiobooks. While the Palm Pre is serviceable as a media player, the iPhone is obviously superior because of its iPod roots.

The other big draw to the Palm Pre is that it is on the Sprint network, which offers more consistent network service than AT&T and is even cheaper with the Simply Everything plan.

But, remember that I was primarily looking for a data device. If I was going to be using this as my primary cellphone for voice calls, the iPhone would have had a big strike against it because it’s not very strong as a phone and AT&T has problems with its voice network, especially in the San Francisco Bay Area where I travel regularly. However, I typically only make a few personal calls a week with this smartphone, and if I run into connection problems I still have the BlackBerry Curve in a pinch (although I try not to use it to make personal calls since it’s a company phone).

For all of those reasons, the iPhone 3G S made the most sense, but as I’ve noted the Palm Pre was pretty impressive and could be a viable option for many business professionals and companies.

For more insights on iPhone, Palm Pre, and other tech topics, follow my Twitter stream at twitter.com/jasonhiner

For iPhone 3G S launch, lines not as long and process streamlined

The launch of both the original iPhone in 2007 and the iPhone 3G in 2008 were plagued by long lines and logistical problems at Apple and AT&T stores, frustrating many iPhone early adopters. Both AT&T and Apple have developed better processes to handle iPhone buyers and upgraders this time around, plus there’s not as much customer euphoria about getting their hands on the latest iPhone on launch day.

In Louisville, Kentucky (TechRepublic’s hometown), the Apple Store in the Oxmoor Center Mall had a line of about 60-70 people when I arrived at 6:50 AM EST. By the time the store opened at 7:00 AM the line had peaked at about 100 and there were two lines, one for people who had pre-ordered and one for walk-ups (who hadn’t pre-ordered).

The walk-up line only had about 20 people and everyone else had all pre-ordered their iPhone 3G S. Originally, I had read that walk-ups wouldn’t start being served until 10:00 AM (official store-opening hour), but at this Apple Store they started working with them immediately. They had a separate process because they had to go through all of the AT&T verification.

The pre-order line definitely moved a lot faster — at least twice as fast — since buyers had already  made choices/changes for wireless plan, gotten AT&T verification, and knew the total cost of their order.

Customers at the Apple Store in Louisville, Kentucky line up to purchase the iPhone 3G S at 7:00 AM on June 19. Photo credit: Jason Hiner

Last year on iPhone launch day at the same Apple Store there were over 250 people in line for the iPhone 3G. I was about 200th in line. I arrived at 7:30 AM and it took until 3:30 PM to actually get an iPhone (there were several times when the servers went down during the day and that really delayed the line), so it took eight hours to get the iPhone 3G.

This year, I was about 70th in line and I made it through the line and purchased an iPhone in around an hour and 45 minutes. I walked out of the Apple Store with an iPhone in hand at 9:35 AM.

Here are few other random notes:

  • For existing AT&T customers, if you were trying to upgrade you had either be the primary account holder on the AT&T account or you had to have the primary account holder with you.
  • Anyone that was from T-Mobile and was trying to port their existing mobile number had to get a new AT&T number first and then was given a phone number to call afterward in order to do the number port.
  • For walk-up customers, the only iPhone 3G S available for purchase was the 16 GB black.
  • I would estimate that at least half of the people in line were existing iPhone users who were upgrading.
  • While Apple employees still used Windows CE wireless terminals to do the payment processing, the employees who managed the pre-order lines used the iPod Touch with a custom app to confirm pre-order details for each customer.

For coverage of iPhone 3G S launch day at other locations across the U.S., see CNET’s live blog.

For more insights on the iPhone and other tech topics, follow my Twitter stream at twitter.com/jasonhiner

Video: Two completely different views of the Palm Pre

This is the summer of the smartphone with the Palm Pre, the iPhone 3G S, and the BlackBerry Tour all taking flight. I recently appeared on Randall Bennett’s TechVi to talk about which smartphones to watch and who’s going to be buying them.

The most interesting part of the show is probably the big difference in opinion about the Palm Pre between me and CrunchGear’s John Biggs, the other guest on this epsiode. John makes some good points about the Pre, but I think the webOS has a much better chance at succeeding and Android and Windows Mobile will likely be the smartphone platforms that come under pressure in the market.

Take a look and see what you think.

Cost comparison chart: iPhone 3G S vs. Palm Pre vs. Google Android G1

Many original iPhone adopters have their contracts ending this summer and many others are simply looking to take the plunge on a new smartphone. There’s never been as many solid choices in smartphone market than there are right now with the new Palm Pre and iPhone 3G S, plus the Google Android G1, the Nokia N97, the BlackBerry Bold, and the BlackBerry Curve 8900.

BillShrink.com, which runs a Web site dedicated to helping consumers save money on their every day bills, has put together an excellent chart (see below) comparing the features and total cost of the iPhone 3G S, Palm Pre, and Google Android G1.

This comparison is based on unlimited data, unlimited voice, and unlimited text messaging. The iPhone comes in as the most costly device at $3800 over two years. The Palm Pre was the cheapest at $2600, with the G1 falling in the middle at $3150.

It should be noted that the Palm Pre really shines because of Sprint’s All-Everything plan, as ZDNet’s Sam Diaz recently noted. If you don’t need unlimited voice or texting, but just unlimited data, the wireless costs of the three phones (and the different carriers) are actually pretty close in cost, as you can see in this comaprison of the iPhone and Palm Pre by Barron’s.

For more insights on Palm Pre, iPhone, and other tech topics, follow my Twitter stream at twitter.com/jasonhiner

IT departments that buy any of these phones in bulk will get better pricing on both hardware and group plans, but this chart is still useful for individuals and small businesses that purchase smartphones at retail.

Specs of iPhone 3G S accidentally revealed: 600 MHz and 256 MB of RAM

  • Date: June 11th, 2009
  • Blogger: Jason Hiner
  • Category: Apple, iPhone

When Apple announced the details of the third generation iPhone hardware, dubbed “iPhone 3G S,” on Monday, it said that the new smartphone would be twice as fast as the current hardware. But, Apple steadfastly refused to reveal the CPU power and amount of RAM of the latest iPhone.

The beans have now been spilled. T-Mobile, the iPhone’s official carrier in the Netherlands, inadvertently revealed the official specs on Wednesday when it posted its product page for the iPhone 3G S (see screenshot below). For those who don’t read Dutch, the bottom line is that the new iPhone has a 600 MHz processor and 256 MB of RAM.

The new specs compare to the 412 MHz CPU and 128 MB of RAM found in both of the first two generations of iPhone hardware. Ironically, the second generation iPod Touch featured a 532 MHz processor.

By comparison, the BlackBerry Bold features a 624 MHz CPU and 128 MB of RAM and it is by far the fastest smartphone I have used up until now. The new Palm Pre has a 600 MHz CPU and 256 MB of RAM and it can multi-task up to 12 applications at once. The new Nokia N97, which is being touted as a powerful handheld device, has just a 434 MHz CPU and 128 MB of RAM. So the new iPhone hardware should make the device very competitive in term of performance.

In its official material, Apple states, “Everything you do on iPhone 3G S is up to 2x faster and more responsive than iPhone 3G.” The company also claims that “updated 3D graphics deliver an incredible gaming experience.” Technical specs about the improved graphics capabilities are one of the few details that have not yet emerged.

For more insights on the iPhone, Apple, and other tech topics, follow my Twitter stream at twitter.com/jasonhiner

It’s a little odd that Apple has been so coy about revealing the tech specs of the new iPhone hardware, but as Macworld’s Jason Snell recently wrote in his article Don’t look inside Apple’s black box, Apple doesn’t want people to think about their products as the sum of the parts but as a more humanized technology experience. And, as such, it takes a different approach to both building products and marketing them.

At the iPhone 3G S announcement, Bob Borchers, iPhone product marketing manager, told Snell, “Overall, it’s just a snappier experience. There are so many different facets to it - it’s just faster, better, quicker, snappier, and a great experience.” He made it clear to Snell that he wasn’t going to reveal engineering details because he said “the usual speeds and feeds” aren’t how Apple characterizes the iPhone.

Nevertheless, techies still want to know the details in order to help set expectations, compare with other devices, and better understand the product, and T-Mobile provided a nice assist. Of course, all of the details will be revealed when the product is officially released and iFixit and others do the full teardown and catalog the chips inside. Naturally, you can also expect a full “Cracking Open” photo gallery from TechRepublic.

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Recent Entries

TR on Twitter

Archives

TechRepublic Blogs



Quick Reference: PC Troubleshooting Pack
Help desk and IT support professionals need the fastest and most complete answers to keep every PC in action. Get the PC troubleshooting solutions you're looking for with this set of four multipage charts.
Buy Now
Lunch And Learn: Windows XP Security Collection
From an introduction to spyware, to how to maintain optimal PC performance, this collection of short presentations will get you up to speed quickly about Microsoft's popular operating sytem and what's necessary to keep it running at peak performance.
Buy Now

SmartPlanet

Click Here