TechRepublic : A ZDNet Tech Community

10 Things

Host: Jody Gilbert, Senior Editor
Contact

We’ve debated the highlights of IT history. Now it’s time to consider a few good ideas that went wrong - or that may have been ill-advised to begin with.


I recently shared a list of events I believe were pivotal in shaping today’s IT industry - things like the development of COBOL and the creation of UNIX. This time around, I’ve listed a few of the biggest failures in IT - but I’ve tried to steer clear of the same ol’ items everyone has on their lists.

Note: This article is also available as a PDF download.

1: Windows Vista

What a disaster! Could Microsoft have assembled a bigger failure if it tried? Well, possibly. But Microsoft wasn’t trying to make a failure — it was trying to make the best of the best. The result was the worst of the best.

2: NeXT

I have to qualify this entry, because NeXT did inspire a lot of software for the Linux desktop (such as AfterStep), and the NeXTSTEP did eventually become the foundation of OS X. So NeXT wasn’t a complete flop.

3: BeOS

What is it with the capiTalIzaTion? Although BeOS has been resurrected as Haiku, the BeOS (and all the cool hardware it promised) never really got off the ground. The PC that promised to be the dream machine for the media crowd fizzled out before its fuse could really be lit.

4: Cobalt Qube

The Cobalt Qube looked cool. If you’re lucky, you can still find one on eBay going cheap. Underneath that tiny blue exterior lay a beefy 64 MB of RAM and an 8.4 Gig HD that was ready and willing to serve up your Web site, your mail, your DNS, or anything else you needed. Ah, but those were the glory days — and short-lived at that. The serious IT crowed quickly realized that function held sway over form, and the cool blue Qubes went nowhere. Even after Sun bought the Cobalt company, these devices did nothing.

5: Y2K

I can’t resist including this one. The entire world was supposed to cave under the pressure this little bug promised, wasn’t it? I even read plenty of sci-fi books based on that premise. But nothing happened. Banks didn’t lose all of your money, the world’s security didn’t fall to pieces, and all IT professionals woke up the next morning collectively saying, “Was that it?”

6: MP3

I know, I know — it isn’t a flop, exactly, but the MP3 format is on this list because of all the licensing issues it has caused. On the Linux operating system alone, MP3 isn’t installed on most distributions, by default, because of licensing issues. As a result, users scramble to get MP3 support built into their various tools. This causes as much hair loss as MP3 causes audio quality loss. There are much better formats out there without the licensing issues, people!

7: Richard Stallman

This man was supposed to be the champion of open source — but he endangers open source at every turn. Instead of making ridiculous claims, RMS should stand down and let someone with a modicum of tact and sense to take over as the voice of open source software.

8: WordPerfect

What I should actually place here is Corel, the maker of WordPerfect, instead of the software itself. WordPerfect was an outstanding word processing tool. Corel, however, was not outstanding in its ability to market and sell something as good as WordPerfect. So instead of a piece of software that should have single-handedly toppled the Microsoft juggernaut, WordPerfect died. This should never have happened. Any other company could have pulled off this win.

9: IPv6

Should this already be in place? Should something so simple really be that hard? The ‘net could run out of IP addresses and there is no solution in place yet. Why? Because we don’t have the problem yet. But didn’t everyone panic with claims that the “IP sky is falling”? Wouldn’t it be smart to go ahead and put this in place? Maybe the powers-that-be are waiting until that very last IPv4 address is issued and we have to say, “We have no more!” At that point, no one will really know how to implement the solution and it will be Y2K all over again.

10: Mesh networks

At one point, wireless was going to cover the entire planet and everyone was going to have free wireless networking, thanks to wireless mesh networks. It didn’t happen. It sounded like a great idea, and sites popped up all over the place trying to get users to set up their own mesh networks to further expand the “net.” It was a grand idea, based on a grand ideal, but it just never got off the ground. That’s a shame, since a “mesh Wifi” would have enabled anyone to be online anywhere. Of course, I am sure the telecoms had NOTHING to do with the fall of mesh networking.

Your turn

Do you agree or disagree with the items on my list of biggest IT failures? What’s missing from the list? Join the discussion and let us know.

Jack WallenJack Wallen was a key player in the introduction of Linux to the original TechRepublic. Beginning with Red Hat 4.2 and a mighty soap box, Jack had found his escape from Windows. It was around Red Hat 6.0 that Jack landed in the hallowed halls of TechRepublic. Read his full bio and profile.

Print/View all Posts Comments on this blog

Thoughts maclovin | 10/30/09
Y2K cost us PLENTY Dr Dij | 11/01/09
which shows it was a technical failure - nt Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
Y2K was a success Saraline | 11/02/09
There was NO problem in reality, it was all BS Deadly Ernest | 11/02/09
you do not have a clue JeffGerhardt | 11/02/09
Yep, probably accounting programs at that, as I said all along Deadly Ernest | 11/02/09
Problem? What problem? chris@... | 11/04/09
Chris, that's exactly what the problem was, and it was Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
You have a big NO CLUE sign on your forehead ulicar | 11/04/09
I said no big problem of the type predicted were found Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Dear Ernest ulicar | 11/04/09
Y10K Problem andrew@... | 11/05/09
Not so n.gurr@... | 01/06/10
If he doesn't have a clue then neither do I! kevaburg@... | 11/03/09
But How Did You KNOW???? Lazarus439 | 11/04/09
Lazarus: How I knew kevaburg@... | 11/07/09
true -- there were issues, but... cbellur@... | 11/04/09
Y2K Ignorance tgstambaugh@... | 11/04/09
Amen - Y2K was not a failure scompas@... | 11/04/09
Well, according to the Star Trek universe... chelms@... | 11/04/09
Oh for sure... SinisterSlay | 11/04/09
Well, what about scarcity of resources?? andrew@... | 11/05/09
Was hoping that the.... SinisterSlay | 11/05/09
I agree... the media is out of control cbellur@... | 11/04/09
Utter drivel jgaskell | 11/04/09
Your Assessment GoboSlayer | 11/04/09
Unlike others, some of us take time away from the computer Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Geez... GoboSlayer | 11/04/09
I love your analogy - better than mine ;-) nt jgaskell | 11/05/09
The drivel was the excessive blow out of the description Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Most other countries Englebert | 11/04/09
A minor accounting issue? JamesRL | 11/05/09
Well said, James RL, it would have been disastrous Englebert | 11/05/09
a bit of irony struck me Neon Samurai | 11/05/09
A zillion small errors at once... techrepublic@... | 11/10/09
I haven't seen this response jimd@... | 11/10/09
Nonsense. baldrickx@... | 11/10/09
your right JeffGerhardt | 11/02/09
So you were one of the few people who actually worked on the Deadly Ernest | 11/02/09
Depends what those 1% of systems were running! chris@... | 11/04/09
Even if it was the Bank of England and all the similar Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Even things like missile systems? NickNielsen | 11/10/09
There were some new programs too jk2001 | 11/04/09
The majority of the programs I looked at had tw digit year Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
ditto: fixing the Y2K problem was a sucess andrewfarnham1@... | 11/04/09
Which begs the question as to why a Year Date was coded Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
crystal ball? djed | 11/04/09
And yet over half the world did nothing and had no problems Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Half the world ? Englebert | 11/04/09
Agree, Y2K was a success PalKerekfy | 11/04/09
The problem, as presented at the time, NEVER existed Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
A view from the future chris@... | 11/04/09
Actually, I've been saying that about global warming BS Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Agreed on that one. nelsonhoover | 11/04/09
agreed, y2k was a success speculatrix | 11/04/09
Y2K was only a success in wasting money for most people Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Australian leads with his chin... again. philr@... | 11/04/09
since many people wer eignoring my initial message Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Yes, Y2K was a HUGE success rsantuci@... | 11/04/09
Since when did Success become Failure ? Englebert | 11/04/09
So which airplane control system did you find that proved Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
They all have to be checked regardless Englebert | 11/04/09
Y2K was INDEED a success greg.champlin@... | 11/04/09
Name one computer system with a proven Y2K flaw that Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
The fact that you did not hear of any... Englebert | 11/04/09
At the time I was working in an organisation that worked Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Y?2K gwhaler | 11/05/09
Agreed rhomp2002@... | 11/04/09
Agreed, Y2K was a big success cstuart@... | 11/04/09
Y2K was a success - to Vendors/Suppliers cwt_sys | 11/04/09
Y2K was a SUCCESS, not a FAILURE! KJQ | 11/09/09
ahhh yes Y2K RookieTech | 11/04/09
"Y2K cost us PLENTY" sdbett@... | 11/05/09
"Y2K cost us PLENTY" sdbett@... | 11/05/09
Discover magazine article RFink | 11/16/09
Three letters: I. R. S. and MARS. Baruch Atta | 11/02/09
You started with it five months ago Neon Samurai | 11/02/09
experience with Vista Baruch Atta | 11/03/09
win7 is the anomoly Neon Samurai | 11/04/09
Win 7 is what they should have released instead of Vista Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
To each his own :) GoboSlayer | 11/04/09
"experience with Vista" sdbett@... | 11/05/09
Everyone's mileage varies n.gurr@... | 01/06/10
Early adopters always pay the freight NickNielsen | 01/06/10
And what about Beagle? kevaburg@... | 11/03/09
something so unintelligent Baruch Atta | 11/03/09
Two major packages design and built in two countries Deadly Ernest | 11/03/09
Imperial Measurements!!! keeperocrumbs | 11/04/09
Amen to that - but it does give all those terrorist groups Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
How can something so unintelligent be allowed to happen? Jerome.Wright@... | 11/04/09
Hey, it was their project and their money - they get to Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
But... Jerome.Wright@... | 11/05/09
What's so wonderful about metric anyway? chris@... | 11/09/09
Yep Techno Rat | 11/09/09
It's only benefit is that .. SObaldrick | 11/10/09
So what is the mileage per dollar over there now? SObaldrick | 11/10/09
SObaldrick funny that Techno Rat | 11/10/09
Aussie measurements jgaskell | 11/10/09
Re Aussie measurements Techno Rat | 11/11/09
Ain't the only one to fail due to wrong measurements Rick_from_BC | 11/04/09
Very true Jerome.Wright@... | 11/05/09
The only serious effort at metric conversion in America NickNielsen | 11/05/09
Matric failed in the US? Did it now? noahspurrier | 11/10/09
Its sad and funny JamesRL | 11/10/09
One experience makes a success? mjc5@... | 11/04/09
One experience makes a success? BaruchAtta | 12/14/09
Nice .. SObaldrick | 12/15/09
I read it as a parody Neon Samurai | 12/16/09
Chalk up another success n.gurr@... | 01/06/10
OS2 info@... | 11/04/09
OS2 - Bad marketing santucciaj@... | 11/04/09
OS/2 beat by Microsoft rondadams@... | 11/04/09
OS/2 didn't start out to destroy Microsoft zackers | 11/06/09
Out of Touch Hal Taback | 11/04/09
#1 top 10 list failure ckelly@... | 11/04/09
WordPerfect was good anita.louis@... | 11/05/09
WordPerfect Was...Perfect? plandok@... | 11/06/09
WordPerfect IS good ! markkino@... | 11/08/09
OS/2 SObaldrick | 11/06/09
OS/2 lacked apps NEW anita.louis@... | 02/09/10
Itanium ? vidhyarthi | 11/08/09
hahah RookieTech | 11/17/09
IBM's Lotus 1-2-3 SilverBullet | 10/30/09
Good point maclovin | 10/30/09
Lotus Smartsuite leo8888 | 11/04/09
Nearly but not quite drowningnotwaving | 11/02/09
failing by trying too hard John.Carbines@... | 11/04/09
And don't forget Ashton Tate lucvdv@... | 11/04/09
The IBM part should explain everything wallacee@... | 11/04/09
IBM strikes again .. 1-2-3 santucciaj@... | 11/04/09
IBM did not invent Lotus 1-2-3... mwagner@... | 11/05/09
Some comments LocoLobo | 10/30/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history Silverlokk | 10/30/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history rwhyte@... | 10/30/09
Dos 6 Neon Samurai | 10/30/09
Remember Harvard Graphics? Ontario Canada | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history KFretz@... | 10/30/09
Another big failure NotSoChiGuy | 10/30/09
HP? What's that? JLVFR | 10/30/09
No, they're made to be out of the box compatible with Windows Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
I can't complain SinisterSlay | 11/01/09
good one, I hope it keeps up like that, for you - nt Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
Actually, Carly was SMART ... mwagner@... | 11/05/09
hp IS selling computers to the enterprise NickNielsen | 11/05/09
the little semi-smart boxes? Neon Samurai | 11/05/09
Slightly larger than that NickNielsen | 11/10/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history support@... | 10/30/09
I'd put Windows Me above Vista pompeychimes | 10/30/09
Windows ME hahaha simon.robb@... | 11/03/09
Was looking for this one :) alexri@... | 11/04/09
Nah Jerome.Wright@... | 11/04/09
Nope garyleroy@... | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history 0netime | 10/30/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history Geek3001 | 10/30/09
Y2K was BS from start to finish - see the link for details Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
You're ignoring other industries Geek3001 | 11/02/09
In the linked post NickNielsen | 11/02/09
Agreed, and none of that would have caused the doomsday Deadly Ernest | 11/02/09
That's why it was a Success Englebert | 11/04/09
because nothing like they were saying was going to go wrong Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Doomsayers Geek3001 | 11/05/09
Deadly Earnest - Doomsday would have come if we did nothing philr@... | 11/05/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history dhavalhirdhav | 10/31/09
THE ONLY FAILURE IS THIS LIST! digitalb | 11/09/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history aapinko | 10/31/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history fknight@... | 10/31/09
I'll only comment on three points - Deadly Ernest | 10/31/09
Either Too Young or You Just Forgot JusCrusin | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history Bug_M-E-Not | 11/01/09
He did give you the opportunity to name your own ten Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
Y2K wasn't a failure essdg12 | 11/01/09
Nothing happened, because nothing was ever going to. Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
Software NOT Hardware! rstanley@... | 11/01/09
I suggest you do a bit more research than just wiki Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
286 / 386 CHIP??? rstanley@... | 11/01/09
I am real, you'd be surprised how many are still in use Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
Just retired one last week SinisterSlay | 11/01/09
Retired, sounds more like a burial, after it drowned - nt Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
Wow! How naive! kevaburg@... | 11/03/09
How 'bout the 8086? NickNielsen | 11/03/09
386 embeded not IT OCamp | 12/13/09
Y2K helped us... but only recently SinisterSlay | 11/01/09
You got that right! NickNielsen | 11/01/09
Test or Guess Englebert | 11/04/09
if y2k wasn't a problem djed | 11/04/09
good headless chook marketing making a mountain out Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Because it would have been a problem if we didn't... SinisterSlay | 11/04/09
Not true rhomp2002@... | 11/04/09
wrong, in the majority of cases the modern software did Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
rhomp2002 is Absolutely correct Englebert | 11/04/09
Definatley a success bpweezer@... | 11/16/09
Richard Stallman? You don't know what you're talking about MP9999 | 11/01/09
I Agree Roadbat | 11/01/09
he serves a purpose Neon Samurai | 11/02/09
Agreed... vucliriel@... | 11/05/09
unfortunately, that can be detremental Neon Samurai | 11/05/09
Agreed, with qualification wsargent@... | 11/04/09
He's the Howard Hughes of free software NickNielsen | 11/01/09
Richard Stallman is not what you say he is! postmako | 11/02/09
The kool-aid must be good... -nt- NickNielsen | 11/02/09
Well lets not go to far.... JeffGerhardt | 11/02/09
As I posted up higher NickNielsen | 11/02/09
Re: Richard Stallman? You don't know what you're talking about jonhaug | 11/04/09
Free software != open source software stend.techrepublic@... | 11/04/09
yep cbellur@... | 11/04/09
OS/2 bill.stephens@... | 11/01/09
I forgot all about OS/2 ... mwagner@... | 11/05/09
OS/2 not a failure John.Carbines@... | 11/10/09
Windows 3.10 Techno Rat | 11/10/09
Win3 versions John.Carbines@... | 11/17/09
Y2K WAS a Success! rstanley@... | 11/01/09
Y2K was pure BS - if nothing had been done a few banking Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
They would probably error SinisterSlay | 11/01/09
Fairly clsoe to what they expected, but they weren't looking Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
you are just wrong JeffGerhardt | 11/02/09
I suggest you go back and study the hardware and software Deadly Ernest | 11/02/09
Still wrong rhomp2002@... | 11/04/09
All accounting, and nonthing to cause planes to drop out of Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Everything is Date Driven Englebert | 11/04/09
no computer dates drive my VCR, or my fridge, or my car - nt Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Millions of dates being used now as I type.. Englebert | 11/04/09
Okay NickNielsen | 11/10/09
You know Nick Techno Rat | 11/10/09
Yeah, well... NickNielsen | 11/10/09
Y2K was a success in the real world lppsguay@... | 11/04/09
And nothing of concern happened in the countries where Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Doesn't mean that nothing would have happened here Englebert | 11/04/09
Manufacturing crberg | 11/04/09
How about XHTML? Rambo Tribble | 11/01/09
free wifi Neon Samurai | 11/02/09
free wifi - OK, I'll help, which prison is he in? - nt Deadly Ernest | 11/03/09
I disagree. XHTML is a good thing. tunghoy | 11/04/09
except modern web sites aren't written in XHTML or HTML - nt Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
XHTML is still used cipherlad@... | 11/04/09
Yet few web sites I visit and view code on use html or xhtml Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history radiofree123 | 11/01/09
Why did Vista make the list over ME? SinisterSlay | 11/01/09
Because ME was only the Home version, while Vista is both Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
That makes sence SinisterSlay | 11/02/09
Biases are obvious GoboSlayer | 11/04/09
I dont think Vista was all that big of a failure SinisterSlay | 11/05/09
Agree GoboSlayer | 11/08/09
Because no one REMEMBERS Windows Me (nt) mwagner@... | 11/05/09
Richard Stallman? I think this list should be on this list! treed-techrepublic@... | 11/01/09
Its called free software zeke123 | 11/01/09
With that last line, you must just LOVE Win 7 - nt Deadly Ernest | 11/01/09
WHAT BS- this tops the list of ten worst lists JeffGerhardt | 11/02/09
Agree completely slater@... | 11/04/09
World's First Web Server slater@... | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history John.Carbines@... | 11/04/09
Lotus Notes Rob C | 11/04/09
Indeed rscarlat@... | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history rickburt212@... | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history SeanOBrian | 11/04/09
Windows Millenium one_lonewolf | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history LizLum | 11/04/09
.NET is a success, it allows MS to undermine the opposition - nt Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
"Bob" and other failures Obdurodon | 11/04/09
WHAT? The 'G-Man.' | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history phil@... | 11/04/09
Novell killed WordPerfect, NOT Corel Ontario Canada | 11/04/09
Not Novell either lucvdv@... | 11/04/09
Windows Killed Word Perfect david.smith@... | 11/04/09
I agree. But shouldn't CorelDRAW be part of the list? tunghoy | 11/04/09
Computing In Schools kjohnson@... | 11/04/09
MP3s work fine on WIndows madmalc567 | 11/04/09
I've never had any trouble playing MP3s I've made in Linux Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history electronics_md@... | 11/04/09
You simply don't know history rshelby@... | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history DMOAIKI | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history gdekhayser@... | 11/04/09
NETSCAPE Failed to survive franciscofossa@... | 11/04/09
After MS spent a few hudnred million pushing them into Deadly Ernest | 11/04/09
Can't agree with this... jtcronin@... | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history techiedavid@... | 11/04/09
Wang - how could you forget about them? They could have owned the world, techiedavid@... | 11/04/09
The failure in is the name... g-man_863 | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history pgotta@... | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history mjstelly | 11/04/09
Different kinds of failure g01d4 | 11/04/09
Number 11 is..... The 'G-Man.' | 11/04/09
Is this where "Cloud Computing" will go? PJfromOttawa | 11/04/09
MP3 was a massive revolution generaltso@... | 11/04/09
MP3 Outgrown its usefulness ken.dally@... | 11/04/09
Agreed. Still a *big* success generaltso@... | 11/05/09
Bob, Newton, IBM Chicklet keyboard??? Ravnor | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history Nicholas_Sacelaris@... | 11/04/09
During Y2K, I was stumbling drunk at a bonfire Bill Olivier | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history TechMitch | 11/04/09
WordPerfect Deserved to Die mcintosh@... | 11/04/09
Re: WordPerfect Deserved to Die mr@... | 11/04/09
Hey .. I think that your are wrong in some items mr@... | 11/04/09
Word Perfect Was Murdered! d.home@... | 11/04/09
Just a word mr@... | 11/04/09
PC/GEOS rscarlat@... | 11/04/09
Linux rscarlat@... | 11/04/09
Carley Fiorina - worst SV CEO stenman@... | 11/04/09
Compaq aquisition was a success zackers | 11/06/09
Y2K - NOT A FAILURE ssyoung@... | 11/04/09
Exactly Englebert | 11/04/09
Y2K Success - Jack Wallen's ignorance is astounding. philr@... | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history vucliriel@... | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history baporopat@... | 11/04/09
I agree... vucliriel@... | 11/05/09
Jack Wallen - Man, you can do so much better. wmoses@... | 11/04/09
Osborne Computers john.riggins@... | 11/04/09
One could argue dbecker@... | 11/04/09
IPv6 learn@... | 11/04/09
Early-mid 90's trifeca of software failures Killary | 11/04/09
Y2K - You are a stirrer. Repeat what am I? philr@... | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history NetropolisII | 11/04/09
Biggest Failure is Crappy Hardware g-man_863 | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history hueta | 11/04/09
Y2K & MP3 Biggest Successes; what are you smoking? purplepetetech | 11/04/09
Hm. I find Y2K to be the absolute biggest failure. seanferd | 11/04/09
Maybe, but the Y2K Projects were a GREAT SUCCESS philr@... | 11/05/09
Absolutely! seanferd | 11/06/09
Y2K & mp3 NickNielsen | 11/05/09
So if Gartner/MSM had not excessively hyped Y2K... Englebert | 11/06/09
It wouldn't even have been noticed NickNielsen | 11/07/09
Mp3 "Inferior" GreyFoxTech | 11/06/09
Whatever, they sound bad to me most of the time. seanferd | 11/06/09
The "garbage" player is a Zune NickNielsen | 11/07/09
The Yugo of compression algorithms SObaldrick | 11/07/09
Popular? NickNielsen | 11/07/09
Pet Rocks Were Not Popular SObaldrick | 11/08/09
Pet Rock Quibble mdtallon | 11/09/09
Popular vs Successful SObaldrick | 11/09/09
You dont know Jack, Wallen (on Y2K) Englebert | 11/04/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history djtrivedi@... | 11/04/09
RE:The 10 (maybe 9)biggest Failures in IT History rmacharia@... | 11/05/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history Loraine Antrim | 11/05/09
Vista not a failure Kanderous | 11/05/09
It depends on who you ask garyleroy@... | 11/05/09
History will sort this out - WP, 123... mdtallon | 11/05/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history eugene.austin@... | 11/05/09
and the WINNER is .... Oracles' NETWORK COMPUTER !! christopher_d_roberts@... | 11/05/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history rhensley@... | 11/05/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history mwagner@... | 11/05/09
MSDOS philr@... | 11/05/09
Lost Opportunity philr@... | 11/05/09
To which MSDOS do you refer? NickNielsen | 11/05/09
MSDOS - The Quick and dirty one. philr@... | 11/05/09
86-DOS (QDOS) seanferd | 11/06/09
re: Y2K John.Carbines@... | 11/05/09
NeXT was not a top 10 tech failure zackers | 11/06/09
NeXT is dead? mdtallon | 11/11/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history lance_peterson@... | 11/06/09
PS/2 - OS/2 dhamilt01@... | 11/07/09
Y2K Really? Techno Rat | 11/08/09
What we have hear .. is a failure to communicate SObaldrick | 11/10/09
Man you no some good jokes Techno Rat | 11/10/09
This post is a failure I think...added to ye olde list. The 'G-Man.' | 01/12/10
You missed client server mainframe, XEROX's GUI OS and Apple steven.bingham@... | 11/17/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history joliver1119@... | 11/18/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history zerg1961 | 11/20/09
RE: The 10 biggest failures in IT history Tapachula | 12/15/09
The Therac 25 is the all-time worst techrepublic@... | 12/17/09
some more failures, and questions on this top 10 list AndyCool22 | 12/22/09
WordPerfect was in trouble before Corel mark@... | 01/12/10
IPv6 is not a fail jzou@... | 02/04/10
You do realise, that the major reaction you'll get to this will be Deadly Ernest | 02/04/10
European Missile Bases SObaldrick | 02/05/10
not to the average USA citizen, some doubted they existed - nt Deadly Ernest | 02/05/10
missiles in europe and accidentily photographed south of the boarder? Neon Samurai | 02/05/10
I won't go into that recent wmd incident, because, when, Deadly Ernest | 02/05/10
not to the average USA citizen, some doubted they existed - nt sdbett@... | 02/06/10

What do you think?

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Recent Entries

TR on Twitter

Archives

TechRepublic Blogs



Quick Reference: Linux Commands
Reduce stress and speed up resolutions with the easiest command references right at your fingertips. You'll receive a PDF file covering Linux, packed with the most common commands you'll need and use daily.
Buy Now
500 Things Every Technology Professional Needs to Know
Did you know Microsoft's RegClean does not work with XP but you can use shareware to clean your registry? Did you know most wireless access points don't have encryption enabled by default? Did you know there are 500 tidbits of information contained in TechRepublic's 500 Things Every Technology Professional Needs to Know that will help you become a successful IT professional.
Buy Now

Popular Sanity Saver Videos